Skip to Content
Last modified by Angela Warkentin on 2025/07/16 15:13
From version 24.2
edited by Angela Warkentin
on 2025/04/17 21:41
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 16.1
edited by Angela Warkentin
on 2025/03/11 09:32
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -29,28 +29,14 @@
29 29  **Second Meeting with the Program Committee 11.03.2025**
30 30  
31 31  * Tuesday, March 11 from 4 - 5:30 pm: [[https:~~/~~/rwth.zoom-x.de/j/65088391540>>https://rwth.zoom-x.de/j/65088391540]]
32 -* Discussion & Results: [[attach:2nd Program Planning March 11.pdf||target="_blank"]]
33 -* Participation: Jan Bürger, Markus Demleitner, Martin Erdmann, Benjamin Fischer, Martin Gasthuber, Simran Guardasani, Thomas Kuhr, Markus Schumacher, Dwayne Spiteri, Angela Warkentin, Sebastian Wozniewski
34 -* Follow-up note from Dwayne: There was one point I think is missing from the slides for your discussions with the other organisers, if we are going to try and create a single timetable with these semi-dissimilar topics, we do need a bridge session to add some continuity, something about the ethics of sustainability. It doesn't have to be too long, but I think it needs to be there if the conference is to have a sense of coherence.
35 35  
36 36  
37 37  
38 -**Third Meeting with the Program Committee 10.04.2025**
39 -
40 -* Tuesday, March 11 from 4 - 5:30 pm: [[https:~~/~~/rwth.zoom-x.de/j/65088391540>>https://rwth.zoom-x.de/j/65088391540]]
41 -* Discussion & Results: [[attach:2nd Program Planning March 11.pdf||target="_blank"]]
42 -* Participation: Jan Bürger, Markus Demleitner, Martin Erdmann, Benjamin Fischer, Martin Gasthuber, Simran Guardasani, Thomas Kuhr, Markus Schumacher, Dwayne Spiteri, Angela Warkentin, Sebastian Wozniewski
43 -* Follow-up note from Dwayne: There was one point I think is missing from the slides for your discussions with the other organisers, if we are going to try and create a single timetable with these semi-dissimilar topics, we do need a bridge session to add some continuity, something about the ethics of sustainability. It doesn't have to be too long, but I think it needs to be there if the conference is to have a sense of coherence.
44 -
45 -
46 -
47 47  ----
48 48  
49 49  
50 -== **Discussion Basis for Second Meeting with the Program Committee 11.03.2025** ==
38 +== **Second Meeting with the Program Committee 11.03.2025** ==
51 51  
52 -**Results: **[[attach:2nd Program Planning March 11.pdf||target="_blank"]]
53 -
54 54  === **1. Regarding Goals ** ===
55 55  
56 56  
... ... @@ -105,16 +105,6 @@
105 105  === **2. Regarding Contents ** ===
106 106  
107 107  
108 -**Possible Focus: “Framework conditions for future research in ErUM in view of ultra-fast AI developments and the urgent need for sustainability in the area of digital transformation”**
109 -
110 -* **Title of the Workshop: Currrently "**[[2nd Workshop on Sustainability in the Digital Transformation of Basic Research on Universe & Matter>>url:https://indico.desy.de/event/47133/]]"
111 -* Sustainability: The topic of sustainability has been initiated by the first workshop/paper; we can already hear about ongoing research projects and draw further consequences for progress.
112 -* Ethics: The topic of ethics deals with AI developments and their significance for ErUM researchers. The aim here is to compile concrete AI developments and to identify probable development possibilities.
113 -** How will it be possible to realize predominantly human-performed research activities with the support of AI tools in the future?
114 -** Can we formulate a range for this?
115 -
116 -
117 -
118 118  |(((
119 119  **Topics  **
120 120  
... ... @@ -251,17 +251,4 @@
251 251  |(% rowspan="2" %)**Teaching & Science **|(% style="width:1011px" %) |(% style="width:222px" %)
252 252  |(% style="width:1011px" %) |(% style="width:222px" %)
253 253  
254 -
255 -
256 -
257 -Consider:
258 -
259 -| |Distinctive Human Skills|How GenAI can supplement learning processes⁺
260 -|Create|Engage in both creative and cognitive processes that leverage human lived experiences, social-emotional interactions, intuition, reflection, and judgment to formulate original solutions.|Support brainstorming processes; suggest a range of alternatives; enumerate potential drawbacks and advantages; describe successful real-world cases; create a tangible deliverable based on human inputs
261 -|Evaluate|Engage in metacognitive reflection; holistically appraise ethical consequences of alternative courses of action; identify significance or situate within a full historical or disciplinary context|Identify pros and cons of various courses of action; develop and check against evaluation rubrics
262 -|Analyze|Critically think and reason within the cognitive and affective domains; justify analysis in depth and with clarity|Compare and contrast data, infer trends and themes in a narrowly-defined context; compute; predict; interpret and relate to real-world problems, decisions, and choices
263 -|Apply|Operate, implement, conduct, execute, experiment, and test in the real world; apply human creativity and imagination to idea and solution development|Make use of a process, model, or method to solve a quantitative or qualitative inquiry; assist students in determining where they went wrong while solving a problem
264 -|Understand|Contextualize answers within emotional, moral, or ethical considerations; select relevant information; explain significance|Accurately describe a concept in different words; recognize a related example; translate to another language
265 -|Remember|Recall information in situations where technology is not readily accessible|Retrieve factual information; list possible answers; define a term; construct a basic chronology or timeline
266 -
267 267  
2nd Program Planning March 11.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.Angela_Warkentin
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2.3 MB
Content